From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,55958fd991db66fe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-16 19:36:54 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!130.133.1.3!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!pc-62-31-50-169-cr.blueyonder.co.UK!not-for-mail
From: nickroberts@blueyonder.co.uk (Nick Roberts)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Advantage of XML based GUI? (was Re: Ada-inspired OS/Language)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 02:36:53 GMT
Organization: AdaOS
Message-ID: <3d868ca3.16065380@news.cis.dfn.de>
References: <mailman.1031523303.26917.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <slrnanots5.2b2.randhol+news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <4519e058.0209101828.cb5ff85@posting.google.com>
 <3d7f9d3f.920665532@news.cis.dfn.de>
 <slrnao0ihd.14r.randhol+news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3d80b566.992395741@news.cis.dfn.de>
 <slrnao1h4s.271.randhol+news@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <3d813a2b.1026389832@news.cis.dfn.de> <3D841FA5.1020305@attbi.com>
 <3D844701.E0E56743@easystreet.com> <3d84f49b.1270762508@news.cis.dfn.de>
 <jHHM$fQsCilo@eisner.encompasserve.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc-62-31-50-169-cr.blueyonder.co.uk (62.31.50.169)
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1032230213 3126943 62.31.50.169 (16 [25716])
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29056
Date: 2002-09-17T02:36:53+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 16 Sep 2002 09:26:53 -0600, Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
strongly typed:

>> As you will see from my other post, AdaOS will offer role-based security,
>> as well as mandatory (clearance levels).
>
>I presume that means for Confidentiality you plan to include the Bell and
>LaPadula compartments as well as levels.  How about the Biba Integrity
>Extensions ?  The code to add that is trivial, since it is the logical
>inverse of of Bell and LaPadula.

Yes indeed, as per the TCSEC. (Essentially this is about the addition of
special categories to the basic levels.) I may even go a step further, and
add different confinement rule options to the categories.

-- 
Nick Roberts
Per Ardua ad Disastra