From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5f6322415d6639e0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!k19g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Eric Hughes <eric.eh9@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Will the defect with formal package parameters be fixed in GNAT
	GPL 2009?
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 10:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <3d7a9444-6565-41a4-a3d3-49f87f8b5ae2@k19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
References: <558b7171-809b-4259-8679-4b4cff9de519@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
	<9d86256d-a0f3-4c43-82f9-98bb4641be69@s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
	<87r5zeru4p.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> <87mya2rtwe.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.70.57.218
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1240852278 12494 127.0.0.1 (27 Apr 2009 17:11:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:11:18 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: k19g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=166.70.57.218;
	posting-account=5RIiTwoAAACt_Eu87gmPAJMoMTeMz-rn
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.9)
	Gecko/2009040821 Firefox/3.0.9 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5562
Date: 2009-04-27T10:11:17-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 27, 9:36=A0am, Samuel Tardieu <s...@rfc1149.net> wrote:
> Also note that the your example compiles fine using either GCC 4.3.3 or
> later using
>
> =A0 with package S is new Signature (<>);

It also compiles fine with GNU GPL 2008 and is beside the point. The
original example was cut down from existing code to a minimal example.
In the original, there were other named parameters along with
"( others =3D> <> )", and so eliding the "other =3D>" part of the syntax
is not an option.