From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ff18b3dfbae1e1d6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-28 06:17:37 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!mutlu.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!not-for-mail
From: john.nospam@nospamassen.nospamdemon.co.uk (John McCabe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada as a real time language
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:20:53 GMT
Organization: A Customer of Demon Internet@THUS plc
Message-ID: <3d6cce03.19310466@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <aki282$jhp$1@newstoo.ericsson.se>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1030540657 28570 158.152.226.81 (28 Aug 2002
 13:17:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:17:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28488
Date: 2002-08-28T13:20:53+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 10:45:18 +0200, "Marcus Hedlund"
<marcus.hedlund@avionics.saab.se> wrote:

>Hi!
>
>I was just wondering about the real-time quality in the Ada language.
>Is it possible to write a good hard real-time system without a RTOS, or
>is it necesary to use a RTOS to achieve good real-time proporties?

>Any help will be greatly appreciated

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the Ravenscar profile has
something to do with HRT systems. If you look on the web for Ada and
Ravenscar you might find something useful.