From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c6c96fe0302f04f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-16 04:29:08 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!212.74.64.35!colt.net!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pipehawk.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: john.nospam@nospamassen.nospamdemon.co.uk (John McCabe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: POLL: Would you use Ada more if...
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 11:25:20 GMT
Message-ID: <3d5ce0d6.10373956@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <ajie5a$oqv$1@phys-news1.kolumbus.fi>
 <J5vT+lyopZ+8@eisner.encompasserve.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1029496934 nnrp-14:27638 NO-IDENT
 pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28093
Date: 2002-08-16T11:25:20+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 16 Aug 2002 05:25:00 -0600, Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
wrote:

>> Why commercially developed? I think people feel there is higher risk in
>> using "without commercial gain" developed packages.[The whole idea might be
>> in error, but if many people feel that way it will affect sales.]

>I favor the traditional business model for several reaons, none of which
>is dislike of Richard Stallman.  I look for something where one can just
>buy software (and updates if needed) without a "10 user minimum".  But it
>is crucial to me that software be available on CDROM not as a "download".

Just for the record, I agree. For many purposes is essential to have
something tangible such as a CD and installation manual.