From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,52fd60a337c05842
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-14 20:02:56 PST
From: Vinzent Hoefler <JeLlyFish.software@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada paper critic
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 05:02:46 +0200
Organization: JeLlyFish software
References: <aebegp$5cpo1$1@ID-100557.news.dfncis.de>
 <aebgq8$5goi4$1@ID-100557.news.dfncis.de>
 <dale-837123.11434614062002@its-aw-news.its.rmit.edu.au>
 <3D0976BD.21FA7516@sympatico.ca> <aecmq7$j2o$1@wanadoo.fr>
 <3D0A1A15.C600F684@sympatico.ca> <aed9b4$rg9$1@wanadoo.fr>
 <3D0A3D89.50E5A3CA@despammed.com> <aedgsh$boq$1@wanadoo.fr>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.3.190.128
Message-ID: <3d0aae5b_1@news.bluewin.ch>
X-Trace: news.bluewin.ch 1024110171 213.3.190.128 (15 Jun 2002 05:02:51 +0200)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@bluewin.ch
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!news.tesion.net!newsfeed-zh.ip-plus.net!news.ip-plus.net!news.bluewin.ch!not-for-mail
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26002
Date: 2002-06-15T05:02:46+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Baugereau" <baugereau@ifrance.kom> wrote:

>The FACT is that Intel C++ beats gnat (and gcc), because much more effort
>has been invested.

Well. But Intel does not build Ada compilers, AFAIK. So do you compare
languages or compilers?

MSVC used to generate faster code than GCC in many circumstances. Does
that mean, I am stuck to Windows?


Vinzent.