From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1b4b86c91ace6ed
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-11 08:10:01 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pipehawk.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: john.nospam@nospamassen.nospamdemon.co.uk (John McCabe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Mode for Emacs
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:12:06 GMT
Message-ID: <3d061316.26395544@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <phxM8.3503$A62.600726@news11-gui.server.ntli.net>
 <pan.2002.06.08.22.29.45.789120.21891@cowgar.com>
 <3D02E558.15D7BA7B@sympatico.ca> <1023786932.251614@edh3>
 <3d05e4b6.14523053@news.demon.co.uk> <3d05f5ac_1@news.tm.net.my>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1023808194 nnrp-13:4570 NO-IDENT
 pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25743
Date: 2002-06-11T15:12:06+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:10:46 +0800, Adrian Hoe
<mailbox@*nospam*adrianhoe.com> wrote:

>John McCabe wrote:
>
>> On 11 Jun 2002 09:12:10 GMT, Frode Tenneboe <ft@alne.edh.ericsson.se>
>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>>David Marceau <davidmarceau@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Jeremy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Emacs is the best for Ada!
>>>>>
>>>>Someone once said: "Great minds think alike" :)
>>>>
>>>[Emacs features deleted]
>>>
>>>My problem is that every time I'd like a specific feature I don't have
>>>time to delve into elisp and hack around, so....would anyone who happen
>>>to have a nicely commented .emacs, which works farily well with both 
>>>emacs and Xemacs, be willing to share their file[s] with equal minded?
>>>
>> 
>> Are you aware that the XEmacs lot have changed their default init file
>> fairly recently?
>> 
>
>Nope. I am not.

Ah - having looked at:

http://www.xemacs.org/Architecting-XEmacs/init-files.html

perhaps I'm a bit premature on that one, but it looks confusing
anyway!