From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5f54b88edd07911d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-17 12:45:08 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!psuvax1!news.cc.swarthmore.edu!netnews.upenn.edu!gopher.cs.uofs.edu!guinness.cs.uofs.edu!beidler From: beidler@guinness.cs.uofs.edu (Jack Beidler) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT Port To WIN or WINNT? Date: 17 Dec 1994 20:09:04 GMT Organization: Department of Computing Sciences Distribution: inet Message-ID: <3cvgh1$gtd@gopher.cs.uofs.edu> References: <3c564v$3ie@news1.cle.ab.com> <3c8mu5$hvj@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: guinness.cs.uofs.edu Date: 1994-12-17T20:09:04+00:00 List-Id: In article <3c8mu5$hvj@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: |> ports are available at NYU for DOS/Windows, NT, OS/2 and many other |> environments as well. |> I'd like to hear from someone who is actually using GNAT from Microsoft Windows 3.1 (or 3.11). In particular, I'd like to know what was done to avoid problems between DJGPP's memory management and Windows memory management. Specifically, did you do anything more than "PIFEdit" the DOS window setting. What DOS window PIF setting seem to work best? -- +----------------------------------------+------------------------+ |John (Jack) Beidler ++ beidler@cs.uofs.edu | | Professor, Computing Sciences Dept. ++ | | University of Scranton ++ (717) 941-7446 (voice) | | Scranton, PA 18510 ++ (717) 941-4250 (FAX) | +------------------------------------+----------------------------+