From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7f9c4ba3b0dc13ca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-17 15:15:54 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Addressing functions
Date: 17 Dec 1994 12:27:58 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3cv72u$nmk@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <3citrc$bb5@earth.usa.net>
 <EACHUS.94Dec13101448@spectre.mitre.org> <evans-161294091837@evans.pgh.pa.us>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1994-12-17T12:27:58-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Art Evans asks if Ada 83 requires support of pragma Interface to Ada. THe
answer is clearly NO, in fact Ada 83 does not require that you support
pragma Interface for any language.

This is one of several respects in which the code example from Bob Eachus
may be considered illegal by an Ada 83 compiler.