From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,532d4809fbdb99c9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-13 07:22:01 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!lab.ultra.nyu.edu!kenner
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Digital and Ada ?
Date: 13 Dec 1994 12:41:56 GMT
Organization: New York University Ultracomputer Research Lab
Message-ID: <3ck4qk$fn2@cmcl2.NYU.EDU>
References: <leschkes.786991439@ferret> <D0MBsE.Kzx@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
 <3cho5r$k4f@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lab.ultra.nyu.edu
Date: 1994-12-13T12:41:56+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3cho5r$k4f@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com> l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE) writes:
>Unfortunately, if you've developed a lot of Ada code on VAX/VMS. you get
>no help from either DEC, Rational or GNAT if you want to use Ada 95. Yet
>another nail in the VAX coffin (but that's a different thread ;).

Actually, GNAT should run just fine under VAX/VMS, since there's a
well-maintained GCC on VAX/VMS.

It's Alpha/VMS where there is currently no Ada 95 solution, nor a
definite plan to make one.