From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,df52cf364e9edc0a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-12 07:38:33 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!news.hal.COM!decwrl!netcomsv!butch!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!l107353 From: l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com (Garlington KE) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is DoD simulation ignoring using Ada????? Date: 12 Dec 1994 14:32:50 GMT Organization: Lockheed Fort Worth Company Message-ID: <3chmui$k4f@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com> References: <9412081620.AA02642@eight-ball.hv.boeing.com.hv.boeing.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Date: 1994-12-12T14:32:50+00:00 List-Id: Bob Crispen (crispen@EIGHT-BALL.HV.BOEING.COM) wrote: : do with over the years, is one such architecture. And I gather : you're using a family of architectures which bear some passing : resemblance to DARTS, in that they're products of something like : the SEI's Structural Modeling process. Yes, the F-22 program uses Structural Modeling. : need to do to get reuse (the architectural part). But I don't see : you doing the easy part (an analysis of commonality and variability : targeted toward embodiment in a process). Here's where I think you That analysis was done early in the program. : c.l.a for not being something it was never intended to be. STARS : is about process-driven reuse, not about proving that Ada is cool. I don't think my comment was related to Ada; rather, despite all the years of STARS existence, I don't hear much about it being used on any major projects. That may just be poor P.R. on the program's point, but nonetheless, there it is. : One more time: STARS is about software engineering, not about Ada : or even about programming. If STARS is focusing on its main goal, : well hooray for them. But isn't it about time for that goal to have been realized? If not, why not? Note that I'm not trying to start a flame war here. I certainly don't claim to be an expert here. It's just that I don't see the same penetration of STARS products as I do of, say, SEI or SPC. As a result, I wouldn't use it as a barometer one way or the other for the use of Ada. : +----------------------------+-----------------------------------------+ : | Rev. Bob "Bob" Crispen | You guys start coding. I'll go see | : | crispen@foxy.hv.boeing.com | what they want. | : +----------------------------+-----------------------------------------+ -------------------------------------------------------------------- Ken Garlington GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com F-22 Computer Resources Lockheed Fort Worth Co. If LFWC or the F-22 program has any opinions, they aren't telling me.