From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9437255512fc91f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-12 03:02:42 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: PM bindings for OS/2 gnat? Date: 11 Dec 1994 23:57:40 -0500 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <3cgl84$t8c@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <3brftn$gcb@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <1994Dec9.192102.30507@roxi.rz.fht-mannheim.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-12-11T23:57:40-05:00 List-Id: We definitely plan to switch GNAT to EMX, but it is not at the top of our priority list. The original decision to use the native compiler was partly just a matter of choosing one of two possibilities, and partly motivated by licensing problems with the EMX library at the time.