From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b73eb137e4ed638
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-16 11:50:57 PST
From: "Kai Schuelke" <kai.schuelke@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <3CE2AF22.2060208@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net>
 <3CE2C8FD.CDD0E75B@nbi.dk> <uk7q5hz1k.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <3ce2e29f.0@news.unibw-muenchen.de> <uznz0t4dz.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Ada Compilers
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 20:50:53 +0200
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
NNTP-Posting-Host: bl15-1107.studfb.unibw-muenchen.de
Message-ID: <3ce3ff73.0@news.unibw-muenchen.de>
X-Trace: 16 May 2002 20:50:27 +0100, bl15-1107.studfb.unibw-muenchen.de
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-han1.dfn.de!news-stu1.dfn.de!news.belwue.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!lrz.de!news.unibw-muenchen.de!bl15-1107.studfb.unibw-muenchen.de
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24219
Date: 2002-05-16T20:50:53+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hello,

what made me feel that Aonix is more "standard" was a combination of some
minor experiences we made at our Ada school and what the teachers said about
Aonix vs. Gnat (we used both). I can use the full license of Aonix, so that
I didn't see it's limitations.

What I really like about Aonix is the IDE (esp. the GUI-Builder) but thats
not really a compiler issue, but I have to admit that the Gnat error
messages were more helpful than the Aonix ones.

My feeling was intended to be a comment form a beginners point of view, but
no conclusion after years of experience.

ReadU

Kai Schuelke