From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7b73eb137e4ed638
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-15 15:35:27 PST
From: "Kai Schuelke" <kai.schuelke@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <3CE2AF22.2060208@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net>
 <3CE2C8FD.CDD0E75B@nbi.dk> <uk7q5hz1k.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Ada Compilers
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 00:35:35 +0200
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
NNTP-Posting-Host: bl15-1107.studfb.unibw-muenchen.de
Message-ID: <3ce2e29f.0@news.unibw-muenchen.de>
X-Trace: 16 May 2002 00:35:11 +0100, bl15-1107.studfb.unibw-muenchen.de
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-han1.dfn.de!news-stu1.dfn.de!news.belwue.de!informatik.tu-muenchen.de!lrz.de!news.unibw-muenchen.de!bl15-1107.studfb.unibw-muenchen.de
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24133
Date: 2002-05-16T00:35:35+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Pascal Obry" <p.obry@wanadoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: Ada Compilers


> Note that there is only one free (speech) Ada compiler, and it is the
single
> Ada compiler to implement all Ada annexes.

Hello,

could you please explain whats the difference to the Aonix compiler? Or
which annexes the other compilers didn't implement? I am just a beginner but
my first impression was that Aonix produced more "reliable" results. But
thats just a feeling.

Good night

Kai Schuelke