From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b19fa62fdce575f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-11 04:02:21 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why don't large companies use Ada? Date: 10 Dec 1994 08:51:53 -0500 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <3ccbpp$73q@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <3bcntp$dgj@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3btgfs$m8c@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <3c6ofm$50v@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3c8i5p$f59@felix.seas.gwu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-12-10T08:51:53-05:00 List-Id: With respect to array transposition, Keith was just pointing out something to compiler implementors, I agree it is relatively unlikely that one would do conversion between fortran style arrays and normal row major arrays, but an OBVIOUS situation is when you are passing data between existing fortran libraries and existing Ada libraries, and it is nice to have a simple notation for the necessary array conversion.