From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b19fa62fdce575f9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-11 04:02:21 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody
From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
Date: 10 Dec 1994 08:50:11 -0500
Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences
Message-ID: <3ccbmk$733@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <3bcntp$dgj@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3btgfs$m8c@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
 <D0DDov.Lyn@alsys.com> <3c6ofm$50v@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>
 <3c8i5p$f59@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu
Date: 1994-12-10T08:50:11-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Michael, I think you are confused about ISUB, and barking up a wrong tree
to say that Ada 9X is superior to PL/1 here. ISUB is a much more powerful
feature than pragma Convention Fortran in Ada 9X, and subsumes it.