From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11232c,bde6489d2ec79329
X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9245b8db9abd376c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-17 03:20:01 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pipehawk.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: john.mccabe@emrad.ns.com (John McCabe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,misc.misc
Subject: Re: Out parameters in a function
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:21:14 GMT
Organization: Emrad Ltd
Message-ID: <3cbd4c57.1135242@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <a9chqr$23e76$1@ID-107015.news.dfncis.de>
 <4519e058.0204150709.55c94dfb@posting.google.com>
 <3cbbe583.3628858@news.demon.co.uk>
 <kssnbugqbs862fkhbfduonhhlaricg4np6@4ax.com>
 <3cbc3f05.26543327@news.demon.co.uk>
 <fb0dad84b83cb3f18e62a52db60c8764.48257@mygate.mailgate.org>
 <ep8qbu4n4ubb511n95k6ohpdl9popsj3m1@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1019038787 nnrp-08:23722 NO-IDENT
 pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22645 misc.misc:6447
Date: 2002-04-17T10:21:14+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 09:57:26 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov
<mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:

>A real advantage [and possible the single one] of returned tuples of
>values is when you are able to use them as a part of the parameter
>list for some other subroutine.

Cant be done in Occam with multi-valued return parameters (As far as I
remember).