From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53c5fea49e77990c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-29 07:28:00 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Dot Net ?
References: <gvSo8.10$X76.855@paloalto-snr2.gtei.net>
 <3CA48637.C5C4DEF5@despammed.com>
From: Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@bourguet.org>
Date: 29 Mar 2002 16:27:48 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Host: cdssoph29.cadence.com
Message-ID: <3ca487fd$1@news.cadence.com>
X-Trace: news.cadence.com 1017415677 cdssoph29.cadence.com (29 Mar 2002
 07:27:57 -0800)
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!news.tufts.edu!uunet!dca.uu.net!news.cadence.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21842
Date: 2002-03-29T16:27:48+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Wes Groleau <wesgroleau@despammed.com> writes:

> Ada on .Net would be a Good Thing, but if it
> would remain truly Ada, it would be a Better Thing.

I seem to remember that Eiffel changed its definition to better fit
the model of .NET.

A+

-- 
Jean-Marc