From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,eb2e0c5efa8c83d2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-18 19:15:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed.iinet.net.au!news.iinet.net.au!not-for-mail From: "Karl-Johan Karlsson" Sender: "Karl-Johan Karlsson" Reply-To: "Karl-Johan Karlsson" Subject: Re: A very strange problem indeed... Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada X-User-Info: 203.59.185.181 References: <3c95f466$0$6552@motown.iinet.net.au> Date: 19 Mar 2002 03:10:31 GMT Message-ID: <3c96ac27$0$6557@motown.iinet.net.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.59.24.218 X-Trace: news.iinet.net.au 1016507431 6557 203.59.24.218 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21438 Date: 2002-03-19T03:10:31+00:00 List-Id: Larry Hazel wrote: > >Not sure I understand the problem, but if the code is in the order above, you >need a Skip_Line call after the Get(Item_Amount), since the Get will not consume >an end_of_line. Yes you are correct! Now my program is complete. A few times I tried to use a New_Line which did not work, I can't believe I didn't try a Skip_Line before. Thank you so very much, Larry.