From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df52cf364e9edc0a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-08 19:29:40 PST
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!pipex!uunet!gwu.edu!gwu.edu!not-for-mail
From: mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Is DoD simulation ignoring using Ada?????
Date: 8 Dec 1994 22:07:53 -0500
Organization: George Washington University
Message-ID: <3c8hm9$edq@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
References: <D0DGF8.IGJ@world.std.com> <3c5e6t$3l9@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.164.9.3
Date: 1994-12-08T22:07:53-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3c5e6t$3l9@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com>,
Garlington KE <l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com> wrote:
>Gregory Aharonian (srctran@world.std.com) wrote:

>:      To what extent are DoD modelling and simulation efforts being encouraged
>: to do their work in Ada?

>On the F-22, not only are new simulations being written in Ada, but some
>existing FORTRAN ones are being converted for LCSS reasons.
                                               ^^^^
Can you translate for us civilians, please?

Mike Feldman