From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e947872b350ada8e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-08 13:48:38 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!uunet!zib-berlin.de!prise.nz.dlr.de!news.dfn.de!uni-muenster.de!asterix.uni-muenster.de!rentmei From: rentmei@asterix.uni-muenster.de (Jahn Rentmeister) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT-Problem '+'-operator with Count Date: 8 Dec 1994 19:45:14 GMT Organization: Westfaelische Wilhelms-Universitaet Muenster, Germany Message-ID: <3c7noa$4d2m@obelix.uni-muenster.de> References: <3bn74o$go5@tucs6.rz.tu-cottbus.de> <2ee30bbc.4a534e4f4445@jsnode.equinox.gen.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: asterix.uni-muenster.de X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Date: 1994-12-08T19:45:14+00:00 List-Id: Bob Duff (bobduff@dsd.camb.inmet.com) wrote: : >Andreas Krohn wrote: : >> 148. procedure solve_matrix(source: in matrix;target: in out matrix) is : >> 149. x,y,i,j:Count; --akt. Pos. in Matrix : >> 157. for x in 1..3 loop --nachbarn ermitteln : >> 158. for y in 1..3 loop : Hard to say. My answer's a guess, too. Anyway, in an extremely polite : forum such as this, who would ever accuse anyone of "spouting BS"? : Instead, I respectfully submit that my guess is more likely correct than : yours. ;-) Given that x and y are declared twice (once in the declarative part as Count and once implicitly in the loop as integer) you might actually be right - but who can be sure? -Jahn -- Those who can, do. Those who can't, try.