From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b19fa62fdce575f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,df9eda71533d664e X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-08 11:27:11 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!pipex!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!watnews.watson.ibm.com!ncohen From: ncohen@watson.ibm.com (Norman H. Cohen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Subject: iSUB in PL/I (was: Re: Why don't large use ?) Date: 8 Dec 1994 17:52:21 GMT Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center Distribution: world Message-ID: <3c7h4l$je4@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> References: <3btldf$aek@network.ucsd.edu> <3c060k$cf7@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3c0jj0$1ra@felix.seas.gwu.edu> <3c610q$gm8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> Reply-To: ncohen@watson.ibm.com NNTP-Posting-Host: rios8.watson.ibm.com Xref: bga.com comp.lang.ada:8424 comp.lang.fortran:7007 Date: 1994-12-08T17:52:21+00:00 List-Id: In article <3c610q$gm8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: |> As far as I know ISUB was always in PL/1, it may not have been in the |> G subset. In the museum section of my bookshelf (next to the July 1982 Ada RM that Robert would have me burn :-) ), is a 1972 edition of the PL/I-F LRM, and it includes iSUB. -- Norman H. Cohen ncohen@watson.ibm.com