From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5139fc56317e5bf1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-18 03:35:01 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pipehawk.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: john.mccabe@emrad.ns.com (John McCabe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How many Ada programmers does it take to change a light bulb?
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:35:33 GMT
Organization: Emrad Ltd
Message-ID: <3c70e700.9335984@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <a471ls$1hu$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.uk> <3C672981.EF98DCB2@acm.org>
 <3c679ff6.5846156@news.demon.co.uk> <3C67AEF6.CE33656E@earthlink.net>
 <3c67df2f.22031249@news.demon.co.uk> <uit93u9a0.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <5ee5b646.0202111824.5b6da01f@posting.google.com>
 <3c68f464.8228081@news.demon.co.uk>
 <5ee5b646.0202160638.4e6326ab@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1014032097 nnrp-13:26390 NO-IDENT
 pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20108
Date: 2002-02-18T11:35:33+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 16 Feb 2002 06:38:33 -0800, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote:

>john.mccabe@emrad.ns.com (John McCabe) wrote in message news:<3c68f464.8228081@news.demon.co.uk>...
>> On 11 Feb 2002 18:24:43 -0800, dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote:
>> 
>> >And it is indeed the case that a search for Ada 95 
>> >yields adahome at the top,
>> 
>> On Google Groups? I don't think so!
>
>
>Well if you search the usenet groups, of course not, 

Well if you read what I said in the first place, you'll see I
suggested Google Groups, so why waste everyone's time by replying to
messages you haven't read properly?