From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,34c2aa33b8bdb1a9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-23 00:58:24 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.DE!not-for-mail From: dmitry@elros.cbb-automation.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Sugestion to Multiple Inheritance Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 08:58:29 GMT Message-ID: <3c4e792f.2217296@News.CIS.DFN.DE> References: <3C444B8D.70309@mail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.de (212.79.194.111) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1011776303 36002218 212.79.194.111 (16 [77047]) X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19220 Date: 2002-01-23T08:58:29+00:00 List-Id: On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 16:55:51 +0000, Brian Rogoff wrote: [...] >I prefer the generic approach to the OO approaches. > >IMHO OOP is not as important as the programming world has made it out to >be, and should be used a lot less than it is. If I substitute ADT for OO, will above remain correct then? [I presume also that "OO approach" = "class wide programming] If it so, then I strongly disagree. Regards, Dmitry Kazakov