From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6009c73a58f787a0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-16 07:18:24 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news-feed1.de1.concert.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.DE!not-for-mail From: dmitry@elros.cbb-automation.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to avoid unreferenced objects (mutexes etc) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:18:22 GMT Message-ID: <3c459721.6999218@News.CIS.DFN.DE> References: <3c3ee8c8.105408250@News.CIS.DFN.DE> <3c429d1c.2624281@News.CIS.DFN.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.de (212.79.194.111) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1011194302 32180516 212.79.194.111 (16 [77047]) X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18970 Date: 2002-01-16T15:18:22+00:00 List-Id: On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 10:41:58 -0500, "Matthew Heaney" wrote: >> So I chose the lesser evil = mutexes with all that nasty problems of >> error recovery, you have pointed. I really do not like it. > >The language gives you primitives so that you can use to build in the >safety. There is no problem using semaphores in Ada95, if you follow >certain idioms. There is no harm in gotos if you know where you go. (:-)) I believe that like in case of gotos, use of semaphores should be minimized [if possible, of course]. Regards, Dmitry Kazakov