From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,b1a9916933cd3f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-09 09:43:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!proxad.net!feeder2-1.proxad.net!news2-1.free.fr!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Next public release of GNAT(?) References: <3c3c0ca8$0$3190$626a54ce@news.free.fr> From: Jean-Marc Bourguet Date: 09 Jan 2002 18:32:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <3c3c7eba$0$3190$626a54ce@news.free.fr> Organization: Guest of ProXad - France NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Jan 2002 18:32:43 MET NNTP-Posting-Host: 158.140.208.29 X-Trace: 1010597563 news2-1.free.fr 3190 158.140.208.29 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18694 Date: 2002-01-09T18:32:43+01:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake writes: > Jean-Marc Bourguet writes: > > > Gerhard H�ring writes: > > > > > Frank wrote in : > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > Is there any forecast on when(if?) the public/free GNAT 3-14 for Linux > > > > becomes available? > > > > > > Yes, it will be the day after I managed to build GNAT from the gcc > > > source tree. > > > > AFAIK, what is present in the CVS tree is an evolution of GNAT 3.14 > > (which is still based on gcc 2.8). > > No, the whole point of the gcc tree is that it is at gcc 3.0, and the > Ada code builds on that. This will be the basis of the ACT 3.15 > release. There is a misunderstanding, my comment applied to GNAT 3.14, not to what is in the CVS tree. > > BTW, personnally, I'd not make public an executable I manage to > > build from non released sources. > > Hmm. What do you mean by "released"? By ACT, or by the gcc team? If > the latter, I'd agree. The gcc team obviously (but I don't think that gcc team will release the ada part without an agrement of Robert Dewar and from what I get the status about ada in 3.1 is "will be present if it is in a aceptable state") -- Jean-Marc