From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b3d7c27160f8353,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-02 02:51:10 PST
From: "Stuart Forster" <stuart.forster@baesystems.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Package name duplication in Hierachical Libraries
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:51:23 -0000
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.31.166.178
Message-ID: <3c32e619$1@pull.gecm.com>
X-Trace: 2 Jan 2002 10:51:05 GMT, 172.31.166.178
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!btnet-peer0!btnet-feed5!btnet!newreader.ukcore.bt.net!pull.gecm.com!172.31.166.178
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18440
Date: 2002-01-02T10:51:23+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I have a problem with duplicated package names in hierarchical libraries.

The example below results in an infinite recursion of B.A.C where I was
hoping for

>Test
B.A.C
A.C
>

Is this the correct behaviour?

I've only tried it on gnat 3.13p.

package A is
   procedure C;
end A;

with Text_IO;
package body A is
   procedure C is
   begin
      Text_IO.Put_Line("A.C");
   end C;
end A;

package B is
end B;

package B.A is
   procedure C;
end B.A;

with A;
with Text_IO;
package body B.A is
   procedure C is
   begin
      Text_IO.Put_Line("B.A.C");
      A.C;                                    -- Instead of calling A.C
calls B.A.C.
   end C;
end B.A;

with B.A;
procedure Test is
begin
   B.A.C;
end Test;