From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a4380ff535aa24d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-06 17:16:08 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.mathworks.com!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Elaboration order [was: cross linking packages] Date: 6 Dec 1994 11:11:21 -0500 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <3c22f9$kb0@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <3bn3vj$pch@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3bg8mp$i0g@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3bj0br$mri@network.ucsd.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-12-06T11:11:21-05:00 List-Id: John's analysis is right, and of course I was talking about specs mutually with'ing one another, which is illegal, and typically caught at compile time.