From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f3f07e9e53bcc4f6,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-18 04:53:39 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.DE!not-for-mail From: dmitry@elros.cbb-automation.de (Dmitry A. Kazakov) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: FILETIME <-> Ada.Real_Time.Time conversions Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 12:53:38 GMT Message-ID: <3c1f3917.16015859@News.CIS.DFN.DE> NNTP-Posting-Host: tar-alcarin.cbb-automation.de (212.79.194.111) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1008680018 17238158 212.79.194.111 (16 [77047]) X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18046 Date: 2001-12-18T12:53:38+00:00 List-Id: Hi! Is there a portable non-statistical way to implement FILETIME* (or any other absolute time) <-> Ada.Real_Time.Time conversions? Regards, Dmitry Kazakov * FILETIME (Win32) is 100-nanosecond count (64-bit) since January 1, 1601.