From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c424d8135e68278
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-11 03:19:07 PST
From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@nospam.baesystems.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <9v4jsj$bd1$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: Ada2005
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:23:07 -0000
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
NNTP-Posting-Host: ed125012.sd.edinbr.gmav.gecm.com
Message-ID: <3c15ebd9$1@pull.gecm.com>
X-Trace: 11 Dec 2001 11:19:53 GMT, ed125012.sd.edinbr.gmav.gecm.com
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!btnet-peer1!btnet-feed5!btnet!newreader.ukcore.bt.net!pull.gecm.com!ed125012.sd.edinbr.gmav.gecm.com
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17738
Date: 2001-12-11T11:23:07+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Peter Hermann" <ica2ph@iris16.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote in message
news:9v4jsj$bd1$1@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de...
> is there consensus on the next standard's name? I have seen
> Ada200x
> Ada20xx
> Ada0x
> Ada0y        [why?]
> ...          [insert your favorite]

well, Ada200x shows a lot more confidence than Ada20xx :-)

Has anyone been tasked with this effort in a similar manner
to the way Tucker was for Ada95? The "single lead plus team"
philosophy certainly seems to work.