From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d575f572a099528 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-05 01:47:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!diablo.theplanet.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pipehawk.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail From: john.mccabe@emrad.com.nospam (John McCabe) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What is faster Ada or C? Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 09:46:51 GMT Organization: Emrad Ltd Message-ID: <3c0de687.2140567@news.demon.co.uk> References: <3c08314d$0$158$9b622d9e@news.freenet.de> <9uau3a$79113$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <3c093895$0$160$9b622d9e@news.freenet.de> <3C09B2D6.663C10BD@acm.org> <27331d9e.0112040343.76f6f16f@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1007545577 nnrp-14:7917 NO-IDENT pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17435 Date: 2001-12-05T09:46:51+00:00 List-Id: On Tue, 04 Dec 2001 14:25:55 GMT, Ted Dennison wrote: >In article <27331d9e.0112040343.76f6f16f@posting.google.com>, john mann says... >> >>I've used the aonix compiler in the past, and for non-numeric types of >>operations (playing about with dispatching ops etc), the run time >>checks added nothing at all. For number crunching, I worked on about >>10-15% difference. > >If this is the ObjectAda compiler you are talking about, then it should be noted >that it has no user-settable optimization options (at least not last I checked), >and is really targetted to general Windows developers, not number crunchers. Mr Mann is more than likely referring to ObjectAda Embedded/Real-Time using PharLap's ETS rather than the vanilla Windows version. Whether this makes a difference or not to the optimisation options is not something I could find on Aonix's website :-)