From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b19fa62fdce575f9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,df9eda71533d664e X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-05 19:03:27 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Why don't large companies use Ada? Date: 5 Dec 1994 17:59:32 -0500 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <3c060k$cf7@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <3btldf$aek@network.ucsd.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Xref: bga.com comp.lang.ada:8309 comp.lang.fortran:6911 Date: 1994-12-05T17:59:32-05:00 List-Id: Mike, have you REALLY met engineers who walked away from PL/1 because of the array subscripting order "problem". If so their behavior is peculiar given the fact that PL/1 allows the specification of subscripting regimes in full generality using ISUB (swapping indices is a trivial application).