From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7a4380ff535aa24d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-30 08:36:30 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail From: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: cross linking packages Date: 30 Nov 1994 10:33:06 -0600 Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services +1 713 684 5969 Message-ID: <3bi9g2$lj@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> References: <3bg8mp$i0g@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com Date: 1994-11-30T10:33:06-06:00 List-Id: In article <3bg8mp$i0g@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, Robert Dewar wrote: > >This is definitely wrong, you have to put both types in the same >package if they have this sort of mutual dependence. > >(and now we can rerun the long dialog on mutually recursive types :-) > No need for that, I've saved the entire diatribe to a single file, which occupies 351K on my account, uncompressed. If anybody wants it, they can have it :-) -- Proud (and vocal) member of Team Ada! (and Team OS/2) ||This is not your Ada -- Very Cool. Doesn't Suck. || father's Ada For all sorts of interesting Ada tidbits, run the command: ||________________ "finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.) |"Quitting C++ isn't so difficult, provided you show as much | | persistence stopping as you did starting." dweller |