From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,155b49c9f46f66ec X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-28 03:46:06 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail From: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: don't understand packages vs. objects/classes Date: 28 Nov 1994 05:35:33 -0600 Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services +1 713 684 5969 Message-ID: <3bcfa5$rqe@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> References: <3ba6qu$6rs@mandolin.gcr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com Date: 1994-11-28T05:35:33-06:00 List-Id: In article <3ba6qu$6rs@mandolin.gcr.com>, Roger Labbe wrote: >generic > type element is private; >package STACKS is > > type stack is private; > > procedure push (s : stack; *ahem* ^insert "in out" here :-) > value : element); > >Get the Ada 9x rationale from the Ada web server if you want to read >a good introduction to Ada 94 and object oriented programming. I don't >have the address right here, but you can find it easily in the newsgroup; >alternatively, send me email and I'll send it to you. > Hmm, I haven't checked the Ada Homepage lately, but I suppose the Rationale is indeed there. In any case, the WWW homepage is: http://lglwww.epfl.ch/Ada/ (don't forget the last /) Also, you can ftp the Rationale from: ajpo.sei.cmu.edu, look under public/ada9x/rm9x/v5.0 (I think there's a v5.7 dir, but I don't remember if the Rationale is there) -- Proud (and vocal) member of Team Ada! (and Team OS/2) ||This is not your Ada -- Very Cool. Doesn't Suck. || father's Ada For all sorts of interesting Ada tidbits, run the command: ||________________ "finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.) |"Quitting C++ isn't so difficult, provided you show as much | | persistence stopping as you did starting." dweller |