From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7ee10ec601726fbf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-09 01:19:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!212.74.64.35!colt.net!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pipehawk.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: john.mccabe@emrad.com.nospam (John McCabe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: is Ada dying?
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 08:18:07 GMT
Organization: Emrad Ltd
Message-ID: <3bc2b25a.1919900@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <Xns9133DBAF0AD71ralphworkcoza@196.25.240.158>
 <9prl5701m0v@drn.newsguy.com> <3bc16b42.3799903@news.demon.co.uk>
 <3BC20BC2.1F92FADB@adaworks.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1002615499 nnrp-02:515 NO-IDENT
 pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13993
Date: 2001-10-09T08:18:07+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 08 Oct 2001 13:25:38 -0700, Richard Riehle
<richard@adaworks.com> wrote:

>John McCabe wrote:
>
>> On 8 Oct 2001 00:38:15 -0700, Robert*@ <Robert_member@newsguy.com>
>> wrote:
>
>John gives a list of Ada 83 compilers below.  Someone might read this as
>an indication that there are fewer compilers for Ada 95 than Ada 83.  What
>has happened is quite different.

Find me an Ada 95 compiler for a Mil-Std-1750A target then?

I'm sure much of what you have said is true but, as far as I've seen,
other than porting GNAT technology, there is little support for lesser
known processors.