From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7eaf9f2597de2259
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-08 09:18:05 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!pipehawk.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: john.mccabe@emrad.com.nospam (John McCabe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: on package naming, should the word "_pkg" be part of it?
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 16:17:04 GMT
Organization: Emrad Ltd
Message-ID: <3bc1d137.20930256@news.demon.co.uk>
References: <9pif1o01btl@drn.newsguy.com> <3BBD12F1.9BED0B70@acm.org>
 <x7vpu81jf1b.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> <3BC0B1D4.21C79A8@acm.org>
 <ud73ymbha.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <mailman.1002557530.12599.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1002557838 nnrp-13:21319 NO-IDENT
 pipehawk.demon.co.uk:158.152.226.81
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13935
Date: 2001-10-08T16:17:04+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mon, 08 Oct 2001 18:11:53 +0200, Francisco Javier Loma Daza
<Francisco.Loma@isotrol.com> wrote:

Francisco

Try this naming convention using generic instantiation of a generic
child package. As far as I can remember, there are serious problems
with attempting this, hence my comment earlier on this thread.

>I use the following name convention
>
>
>package Car is
>
>	type Object is record .. end record;
>
>	procedure Oper1(this: Object);
>
>end Car;
>
>and then
>
>	a_car: Car.Object;
>
>I like this way because generic instantiation keeps very readable
>
>	package Car_List is new Generic_List(Car.Object);
>
>and then
>
>	a_car_list: Car_List.Object;