From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,582dff0b3f065a52
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-17 03:55:01 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsgate.cistron.nl!news.worldonline.nl!newsclients!news.worldonline.nl!not-for-mail
From: info@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of
    service attack.
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:23:13 GMT
Organization: Go wash your mouth.
Message-ID: <3b7ceef1.688682654@news.worldonline.nl>
References: <bebbba07.0107292308.d1192fc@posting.google.com>
 <3b690498.1111845720@news.worldonline.nl> <9kbu15$9bj@augusta.math.psu.edu>
 <made-on-a-macintosh-969204-20460@usenet.l1t.lt>
 <9kbvsr$a02@augusta.math.psu.edu> <3B69DB35.4412459E@home.com>
 <q22nk9.r1p.ln@10.0.0.2> <JzUb7.1653$NJ6.5860@www.newsranger.com>
 <9kp9n7$ivm$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <apesk9.env.ln@10.0.0.2>
 <sYwc7.3920$NJ6.15560@www.newsranger.com> <r1nuk9.2ua.ln@10.0.0.2>
 <3B73337F.862F8D93@home.com> <9lb7hu$72h$1@norfair.nerim.net>
 <3B7C6977.3648F061@home.com> <bO_e7.71788$B37.1653935@news1.rdc1.bc.home.com>
 <3B7CE3E1.6F80@mindspring.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vp210-128.worldonline.nl
X-Trace: nereid.worldonline.nl 998045511 17742 195.241.210.128 (17 Aug 2001
 10:51:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@worldonline.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Aug 2001 10:51:51 GMT
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12040 comp.lang.c:74969
 comp.lang.c++:83390
Date: 2001-08-17T10:51:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> wrote:

> "The standard library is not part of the C language proper,
> but an environment that supports standard C will provide
> the function declarations and type and macro definitions 
> of this library."
> 
> K&R2 appendix B

That's probably a leftover from the days of K&R 1, when it was true. In
ISO C, the Standard describes both the grammar and the library, and both
are part of the language.

Richard