From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c397a9e135b263db X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-05 18:47:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed.news.qwest.net!hardy.tc.umn.edu!laurel.tc.umn.edu!not-for-mail From: brentcarnellis@hotmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: What happens to DEC Ada? Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 01:48:31 GMT Organization: Impossible Message-ID: <3b6def8c.4410400@news.tc.umn.edu> References: <9ff447f2.0107310659.36d01e9@posting.google.com> <%jra7.3545$257.153834@ozemail.com.au> X-Trace: laurel.tc.umn.edu 997062420 9786 134.84.254.99 (6 Aug 2001 01:47:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@laurel.tc.umn.edu X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11334 Date: 2001-08-06T01:48:31+00:00 List-Id: On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 11:31:42 GMT, "nicolas" wrote: >Beside that, the timestamp method cannot always be trusted. >We had problems with gnatmake which doesn't always recompile necessary >files. This so-called problem is a blatant example of fear-mongering ... >The problem occurs when several files in different directories have same >name, same timestamp, and are selected with ADA_INCLUDE_PATH >timestamp and name of the file is checked, they are the sames, gnatmake >doesn't figure out that this is a different file and doesn't recompile it. > ... because it looks like the file attributes have been dicked around with. To get similar symptons, I suggest you open the case on your workstation and pour soy sauce on your circuit boards.