From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7bcba1db9ed24fa7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-07 14:41:43 PST Reply-To: "Andrzej Lewandowski" From: "Andrzej Lewandowski" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <3B460DA9.C2965042@ix.netcom.com> <9ff447f2.0107061757.34ca0723@posting.google.com> <3B475678.C582735D@worldnet.att.net> Subject: Re: is ada dead? Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 17:41:45 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 NNTP-Posting-Host: slip-12-64-163-133.mis.prserv.net Message-ID: <3b478165_3@news3.prserv.net> X-Trace: 7 Jul 2001 21:38:45 GMT, slip-12-64-163-133.mis.prserv.net Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!feeder.qis.net!washdc3-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed.us.prserv.net!prserv.net!news3.prserv.net!slip-12-64-163-133.mis.prserv.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9616 Date: 2001-07-07T17:41:45-05:00 List-Id: "James Rogers" wrote in message news:3B475678.C582735D@worldnet.att.net... > Adrian Hoe, > > Java is clearly not superior to Ada. Java is not even clearly > newer than Ada. Java is clearly more unstable and unsafe to use > than Ada. > But almost everybody is using Java and almost non\body is using Ada. Who said this?... "garbage dumps are full of superior solutions". The process of adapting programming language has very little technical component, it is rather business and social process. A.L.