From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,335e9f05eb0dcfa0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-18 21:13:45 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: comar@cs.nyu.edu (Cyrille Comar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SGI inheriting C++ classes ... Date: 19 Nov 1994 00:13:45 -0500 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <3ak1i9$8hu@lang8.cs.nyu.edu> References: <3ajc7c$6ul@fido.asd.sgi.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lang8.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-11-19T00:13:45-05:00 List-Id: quiggle@lovelace.wpd.sgi.com (Tom Quiggle) writes: : : As has been widely publicized, SGI's Ada9x product strategy is based on : a commercially supported version of the GNAT, integrated with SGI's : multilinguial software development environment. Following detailed : design discussions with SGI, the GNAT team (and specifically Cyrille : Comar) has added several implementation-defined pragmas to the GNAT to : facilitate interfacing to C++ classes from Ada. Thank's Tom for the reference. I wrote a tiny document explaining the basic syntax and semantic of those implementation-defined pragmas. This document is ftp-available along with the slides of my presentation about the implementation of tagged types in GNAT at Tri-Ada'94 Fell free to pick them up in pub/gnat/docs (cs.nyu.edu) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cyrille Comar, E-mail: comar@cs.nyu.edu Gnat Project US phone: (212) 998-3489