From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,335e9f05eb0dcfa0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-17 19:39:19 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!nntp.crl.com!decwrl!hookup!newshost.marcam.com!zip.eecs.umich.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!darwin.sura.net!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail
From: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: SGI inheriting C++ classes ...
Date: 17 Nov 1994 20:47:04 -0600
Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services   +1 713 684 5969
Message-ID: <3ah4j8$s18@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
References: <2ECBCF25@SMTPGATE2.STRATCOM.AF.MIL>
NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com
Date: 1994-11-17T20:47:04-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <2ECBCF25@SMTPGATE2.STRATCOM.AF.MIL>,
Bennett, Chip (KTR) ~U <BennettC@J64.STRATCOM.AF.MIL> wrote:
>Recently, in info-ada, David Weller made a reference to "... SGI's cool
>demonstration of inheriting from C++ classes ...", that from the context, I
>assume means inherited by Ada 9X.
>
>What is that all about.  Did SGI demo the ability to fully inherit C++
>classes by Ada 9X at TRI-Ada?
>

Yes!  YOu must have missed that demo :-)  That was The Big Brag in
the SGI booth (with words backed up by deeds, in the traditional SGI
fashion :-)
.


-- 
Proud (and vocal) member of Team Ada! (and Team OS/2)        ||This is not your
   	      Ada -- Very Cool.  Doesn't Suck.               ||  father's Ada 
For all sorts of interesting Ada tidbits, run the command:   ||________________
"finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.)
      Just another dull, stodgy, non-creative developer who uses Ada.