From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,17272755d507940a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-17 03:54:10 PST
From: "Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@nospam.baesystems.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <7JLC6.7894$tv1.521123@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
 <WOIJmDizZAvO@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <btNC6.8379$tv1.551002@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Opengl bindings for Gnat
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:40:08 +0100
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
NNTP-Posting-Host: sg2c11210.dsge.edinbr.gmav.gecm.com
Message-ID: <3adc1b7a$1@pull.gecm.com>
X-Trace: 17 Apr 2001 11:31:22 GMT, sg2c11210.dsge.edinbr.gmav.gecm.com
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!cyclone-sjo1.usenetserver.com!news-out-sjo.usenetserver.com!europa.netcrusader.net!194.176.220.129!newsfeed.icl.net!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!btnet-peer0!btnet-feed5!btnet!newreader.ukcore.bt.net!pull.gecm.com!sg2c11210.dsge.edinbr.gmav.gecm.com
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:6944
Date: 2001-04-17T11:40:08+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Sounds like the same as GNAT. Thry looking in:

\GNAT\Bindings\Win32Ada

Phaedrus <phaedrusalt@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:btNC6.8379$tv1.551002@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
> If it were self contained (Didn't reference any other package(s)) then it
> should be the same.  But, for instance, ever taken a look at the bindings
> created for ObjectAda?   First of all, the opengl package is implemented
> as a child package of the "win32" package, and both rely on a small
> mountain of types created in still other packages.  Sure, I could chase it
> down and end up with pretty much the same set as ObjectAda, but why
> should I?  According to some sites a nice binding is available somewhere
> (Darned if I can find it!) for Gnat, which should make it a piece of cake.
>
> In other words, I'm lazy and I'd rather not re-invent the wheel, if at all
> possible.
>
> Phaedrus
>
> "Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam> wrote in message
> news:WOIJmDizZAvO@eisner.encompasserve.org...
> > In article <7JLC6.7894$tv1.521123@newsread1.prod.itd.earthlink.net>,
> "Phaedrus" <phaedrusalt@hotmail.com> writes:
> > > Does anybody know where I can find the OpenGl bindings
> > > for Gnat?
> >
> > How would one expect them to differ from any OpenGL bindings for Ada ?
>
>