From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b19fa62fdce575f9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-15 21:16:13 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!cyberspace.com!cyberspace.com!not-for-mail
From: rtfm@cyberspace.com (Dan Thies)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why don't large companies use Ada?
Date: 15 Nov 1994 21:04:15 -0800
Organization: Cyberlink Communications (206) 281-5397
Message-ID: <3ac3sf$4ml@case.cyberspace.com>
References: <3a6oc5$dkh@nntp1.u.washington.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: case.cyberspace.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Date: 1994-11-15T21:04:15-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jamie Jamison (niteowl@u.washington.edu) wrote:
<a bunch of stuff about how great Ada is>

<which I agree with>

This article has been cross-posted to just about every comp.lang 
newsgroup in existence.

Whoever decided to do this, please get over to news.answers and get some 
of the basic usenet and netiquette FAQs.  Nobody is going to be swayed if 
posts from Team Ada are appearing in comp.databases.oracle.  At the most, 
I would say comp.object and comp.programming have some remote possibility 
of having some interest in this.

Dan
rtfm@cyberspace.com
-- 
rtfm@cyberspace.com