From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d52a75fd633fefc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-21 07:58:07 PST From: "Martin Dowie" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <3A844255.24A4DBA3@lmco.com> <968vnc$5a2$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A8C6843.B46006D6@lmco.com> <3A93C0DC.37A37955@baesystems.com> Subject: Re: Ada to C++ translator? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:58:07 -0000 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 NNTP-Posting-Host: sg2ntw48151.dsge.edinbr.gmav.gecm.com Message-ID: <3a93e3b9$1@pull.gecm.com> X-Trace: 21 Feb 2001 15:50:17 GMT, sg2ntw48151.dsge.edinbr.gmav.gecm.com Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!teaser.fr!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!grolier!btnet-peer0!btnet-feed5!btnet!newreader.ukcore.bt.net!pull.gecm.com!sg2ntw48151.dsge.edinbr.gmav.gecm.com Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5402 Date: 2001-02-21T15:58:07+00:00 List-Id: That's what I thought too when I first went to the page as it has "27 March 1998" at the top. Look down at the very bottom though and you will descover it is still being maintained and the last change was on "2-01-2001" i.e. all rules listed _still_ apply! "Bob Jacobs" wrote in message news:3A93C0DC.37A37955@baesystems.com... > > > Ted Dennison wrote: > > > > And I don't see how having a C++ port is that going to help you the next time > > you port to a new system. Odds are you are actually *better off* right now with > > the Ada sources than you would have been with C++ sources. At least the Ada > > language itself is portable. C++ can't even say that much. The C++ porting guide > > for Mozilla forbids using quite a few *core* language features (templates, > > static constructors, exceptions, namespaces, among others) due to portability > > issues. You can see > > http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/portable-cpp.html for the whole list. If you *do* > > port to C++, you'd do well to read and follow it. > > > The last time I checked, which was only a few weeks ago, the Mozilla > guide was so dated that it's pretty much useless. > > Bob Jacobs