From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f810a72c16e22a72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-16 10:10:20 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!news.ege.edu.tr!news.metu.edu.tr!mother.usf.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.sesqui.net!uuneo.neosoft.com!Starbase.NeoSoft.COM!not-for-mail From: dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SPC guidelines for Ada 9X? Date: 14 Nov 1994 10:34:08 -0600 Organization: NeoSoft Internet Services +1 713 684 5969 Message-ID: <3a83i0$2c0@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: starbase.neosoft.com Date: 1994-11-14T10:34:08-06:00 List-Id: In article , Mike J. Meiers wrote: >Is the SPC (or any other organization) publishing an updated version of the >much-revered "Ada Quality and Style: Guidelines for Professional Programmers" >that will cover Ada 9X? Yes. >If so, when will such a guide be released for use by >non-SPC members? We would like to be a bit pro-active in the updating of our >standards for Ada 9X and would prefer to not work in a vacuum. > >Thanks for any help you can provide. > I know the SPC is aggressively trying to get a new version of the Q&S out within a few months of publication of the Ada 9X language standard. In the meantime, you should use the styles covered in the Ada 9X Reference Manual and Rationale -- in particular, the Rationale contains many good "style" issues. I seriously doubt you'd work in a "vacuum" though, you could always generally apply the "old" version of the Q&S rather successfully. -- Proud (and vocal) member of Team Ada! (and Team OS/2) ||This is not your Ada -- Very Cool. Doesn't Suck. || father's Ada For all sorts of interesting Ada tidbits, run the command: ||________________ "finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.) ObNitPick: Spelling Ada as ADA is like spelling C++ as CPLUSPLUS. :-)