From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,1215ae14d6556de8 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?= Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: More of less most standard Ada binding to POSIX Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:40:07 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <3a6d7438-71f8-4750-8ebc-fdf5232611ee@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.75.149.119 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1264556407 22072 127.0.0.1 (27 Jan 2010 01:40:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.75.149.119; posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8826 Date: 2010-01-26T17:40:07-08:00 List-Id: On 26 jan, 20:44, Manuel Gomez wrote: > Have you read the POSIX binding page on the Ada Programming wikibook > [1]? That's all the information I could gather about the Ada-POSIX > standard. The only implementation of the standard, apart from Florist, > that I found was an incomplete one for Win32 systems by Pascal Obry > [2]. But I've found now that Object Ada for Linux also provides one > [3]. > > [1]http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Platform/POSIX > [2]http://pagesperso-orange.fr/pascal.obry/w32posix.html > [3]http://www.aonix.com/pdf/oa-linux.pdf So it's covered by an ISO standard, that's important to known there is such a standard, but ISO standards also means =93 not public =94 (IMHO : is a standard specification really a standard specification if it's not public ? ... does not value more than these various states law citizens do not know about ... ) It's in my bookmarks now any way (obviously thanks for these points). Gonna order it as soon as I'm rich enough