From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7394239292cca97d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-06 17:41:02 PST Reply-To: "Andrzej Lewandowski" From: "Andrzej Lewandowski" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <3a53bed0_3@news3.prserv.net> Subject: Re: Is JGNAT production ready?... Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 20:25:55 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.101.254.131 Message-ID: <3a57c6a8_2@news3.prserv.net> X-Trace: 7 Jan 2001 01:30:16 GMT, 32.101.254.131 Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!nntp.primenet.com!nntp.gblx.net!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.us.ibm.net!ibm.net!news3.prserv.net!32.101.254.131 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3729 Date: 2001-01-06T20:25:55-06:00 List-Id: "Pascal Obry" wrote in message news:usnmwn42b.fsf@wanadoo.fr... > > "Andrzej Lewandowski" writes: > > > I am working on some Java application that is heavily using threads. > > Programming multithreaded applications in Java is, ehem... sorry... > > no fun. Therefore, I have undusted my Ada83 skills, upgraded to 95 > > and I am thinking about using JGNAT for this part of application that > > uses threads, with the rest in plain Java. > > > > This is commercial application, and I have no room for mistakes. > > So the main mistake will be to use the puplic release meaning no support :) > > > Mistakes would be expensive. Therefore, the question(s): what is the > > quality of JGNAT? Is here anybody who has experience with using > > JGNAT for medium-size real life projects? Linking JGNAT modules > > with Java modules? Quality of JGNAT threads?... > > > > Other question: is GNU JGNAT as good/bad as the commercial version > > of JGNAT? Are they the same JGNATs?... > > Well JGNAT is JGNAT. The main difference is the support not the tool. > Well, if both JGNATs are the same, what "support" means? They will be teachning me Ada?... A.L.