From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC,XPRIO autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7394239292cca97d,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-03 16:09:39 PST Reply-To: "Andrzej Lewandowski" From: "Andrzej Lewandowski" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Is JGNAT production ready?... Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 19:03:23 -0600 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.100.225.193 Message-ID: <3a53bed0_3@news3.prserv.net> X-Trace: 4 Jan 2001 00:07:44 GMT, 32.100.225.193 Organization: Global Network Services - Remote Access Mail & News Services X-Complaints-To: abuse@prserv.net Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.us.ibm.net!ibm.net!news3.prserv.net!32.100.225.193 Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3634 Date: 2001-01-03T19:03:23-06:00 List-Id: I am working on some Java application that is heavily using threads. Programming multithreaded applications in Java is, ehem... sorry... no fun. Therefore, I have undusted my Ada83 skills, upgraded to 95 and I am thinking about using JGNAT for this part of application that uses threads, with the rest in plain Java. This is commercial application, and I have no room for mistakes. Mistakes would be expensive. Therefore, the question(s): what is the quality of JGNAT? Is here anybody who has experience with using JGNAT for medium-size real life projects? Linking JGNAT modules with Java modules? Quality of JGNAT threads?... Other question: is GNU JGNAT as good/bad as the commercial version of JGNAT? Are they the same JGNATs?... Andrzej Lewandowski