From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,682ac581ea925e5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-12 16:09:55 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!hudson.lm.com!godot.cc.duq.edu!news.duke.edu!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!gatech!swiss.ans.net!cmcl2!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!thecourier.cims.nyu.edu!nobody From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Systemless use of 'Address. Date: 12 Nov 1994 15:38:39 -0500 Organization: Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences Message-ID: <3a394f$3fd@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> References: <9411101514.AA21438@eurocontrol.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: gnat.cs.nyu.edu Date: 1994-11-12T15:38:39-05:00 List-Id: Actually I don't see why you would expect a "with" of System to be required, since no entity from system is mentioned, and hence accessibility to System is not required. The use of the 'Address attribute in the absence of visibility into System is certainly a little peculiar. A strict reading of 1815 probably indicates that there is no requirement for package system to be present, but this is obviously peculiar, and AI-00043/08-BI-WA addresses this issue by requiring that the unit using 'Address must depend directly or indirectly on System (but still does not require an explicit with of system). Ada 9X makes this rule a clear part of the language. Note: I stronly recommend having at hand a copy of the Annotated Ada Reference Manual from Karl Nyberg if you are still using Ada 83. It's well layed out, and allows you to answer questions like this, complete with appropriate AI references, easily.