From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b50bc6538a649497 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Chad R. Meiners" Subject: Re: Ada student homework ? Date: 2000/11/08 Message-ID: <3a095057.0@silver.truman.edu>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 691324802 References: <3A02CED4.520C2768@brighton.ac.uk> <3A078B6F.D34B024B@erols.com> <8ua3m1$bru$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A0916BB.584C6C60@cadwin.com> <3A0952B9.34BE19D1@cadwin.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Trace: news.more.net 973712825 150.243.160.9 (Wed, 08 Nov 2000 13:47:05 CST) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 13:47:05 CST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-11-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: "Nicolas Brunot" wrote in message news:3A0952B9.34BE19D1@cadwin.com... > Nobody forces you to answer them. > I personally wouldn't like to ride on an airplane programmed by R.Dewar who would certainly > explained he expected the plane to crash because the compiler behaves as he expects ... This seems to be a completely unwarranted attack on Robert Dewar. From my observation, Dr. Dewar appears to have a very critical eye for detail and a genuine concern for correctness. Both of these qualities seem to me to be very important when developing critical software. -Chad R. Meiners