From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c32fe290813aec20
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local02.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:53:22 -0600
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: New Ada portable GUI Library?
References: <wcc1w8fzz9e.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <3LqdnZ0ffYYPeg3anZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@comcast.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:53:22 -0600
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.202.183.17
X-Trace: 
 sv3-2kHwPPVueACiRLwdJGjcHsqvLLjEa+8WYElsL4qP3maTJXIYT0ri+YBRn2h22nQVRaThZwhiypBGR4V!sZwu4b/cVXpuutQYY/boQWuFJ1RooGIX2PEptqjxc/3QeBFt2zbTOAsVKbAA5SUkZ3nEmGc7nU00!NzKWy6zP6/I/yDNxDeBD0bcS1TonfQ==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.37
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19464
Date: 2008-01-18T11:53:22-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> If you develop code from scratch, you probably don't want -gnatE.
> GNAT will impose some fairly minor restrictions on you,
> and in return you get a statically determined elaboration
> order that will work, and you don't have to mess around
> with the various elaboration control pragmas.  And you
> can avoid the run-time overhead of elaboration checks on
> every call.
   Does that mean the designers of Ada's elaboration got it wrong?